>Harvard's Manage Mentor Module: Keeping Teams on Target<
Dealing with Discomfort
“Leaders… should… provide an environment that promotes disagreement.” Hold on a second did I read that right? Is Paul Michelman really saying that as a leader I should promote disagreement? It seems so. And he goes on to explain. “Healthy conflict enables teams to bring all team knowledge and opinions to the surface, which leads to better decisions.” It makes sense but the words conflict and disagreement are words that for me have always brought negative connotations. This is an area that as a leader I struggle most.
Michelman however was not the only author in this module that taught the importance of facing conflict when leading a team. In Harvard’s Management Communication publication newsletter the authors give multiple scenarios in which facing conflict is essential. They advise that when someone on a team explodes that you calmly ask the person to “pleas sit down, stop pounding the table and settle down.” Or when you have that team member that analysis every flaw of all the given suggestions that you respond by saying, “Sue, you’ve made it very clear shy you think these ideas won’t work. What do you think will?” Or when you have that guy that is muttering comments at the back of the room under his breath you say, “I’m sorry John, I didn’t catch that comment. Can you repeat it please? I don’t like to miss anyone’s contribution.”
As I sat here reading my stomach started turning uncomfortably as I realized that as a leader I avoid these types of direct confrontation. I want every one to simply get along and when they don’t I avoid the situations. Which of course never works but I have tried fooling myself into believing that someday I would know the perfect painless answer. Well thanks Harvard, you have shattered that delusion.
I was very much in need of the module. It awakened me to the unpleasant reality that if I am going to become a good leader I must learn how to effectively face and even start conflicts in order to achieve the greater good. I must learn that disagreements are healthy and in fact essential to a productive team.
Why is this so hard for me? I believe it stems from my personality type which never wants to cause others discomfort. I have often found myself telling small white lies in order to mask or hide the truth in order to spare another person’s feelings. But I must admit that in the long run these seemingly insignificant deceptions lead to a break down first in communication and then in the rest of the relationship.
From this module I am learning that being uncomfortable or making others uncomfortable is not necessarily a bad thing. It is a part of life. It brings to mind Brice C Hafen’s quote “The church is not here to only comfort the afflicted but to afflict the comfortable.”
Due to this module I am now setting the goal that when faced with an uncomfortable situation I will not shy away but instead I will be assertive and confront the issue or individual that is contributing to y discomfort. Not to attack but to allow others to understand my feelings and perspectives and open the doors for more sincere and productive communication.
Dealing with Discomfort
“Leaders… should… provide an environment that promotes disagreement.” Hold on a second did I read that right? Is Paul Michelman really saying that as a leader I should promote disagreement? It seems so. And he goes on to explain. “Healthy conflict enables teams to bring all team knowledge and opinions to the surface, which leads to better decisions.” It makes sense but the words conflict and disagreement are words that for me have always brought negative connotations. This is an area that as a leader I struggle most.
Michelman however was not the only author in this module that taught the importance of facing conflict when leading a team. In Harvard’s Management Communication publication newsletter the authors give multiple scenarios in which facing conflict is essential. They advise that when someone on a team explodes that you calmly ask the person to “pleas sit down, stop pounding the table and settle down.” Or when you have that team member that analysis every flaw of all the given suggestions that you respond by saying, “Sue, you’ve made it very clear shy you think these ideas won’t work. What do you think will?” Or when you have that guy that is muttering comments at the back of the room under his breath you say, “I’m sorry John, I didn’t catch that comment. Can you repeat it please? I don’t like to miss anyone’s contribution.”
As I sat here reading my stomach started turning uncomfortably as I realized that as a leader I avoid these types of direct confrontation. I want every one to simply get along and when they don’t I avoid the situations. Which of course never works but I have tried fooling myself into believing that someday I would know the perfect painless answer. Well thanks Harvard, you have shattered that delusion.
I was very much in need of the module. It awakened me to the unpleasant reality that if I am going to become a good leader I must learn how to effectively face and even start conflicts in order to achieve the greater good. I must learn that disagreements are healthy and in fact essential to a productive team.
Why is this so hard for me? I believe it stems from my personality type which never wants to cause others discomfort. I have often found myself telling small white lies in order to mask or hide the truth in order to spare another person’s feelings. But I must admit that in the long run these seemingly insignificant deceptions lead to a break down first in communication and then in the rest of the relationship.
From this module I am learning that being uncomfortable or making others uncomfortable is not necessarily a bad thing. It is a part of life. It brings to mind Brice C Hafen’s quote “The church is not here to only comfort the afflicted but to afflict the comfortable.”
Due to this module I am now setting the goal that when faced with an uncomfortable situation I will not shy away but instead I will be assertive and confront the issue or individual that is contributing to y discomfort. Not to attack but to allow others to understand my feelings and perspectives and open the doors for more sincere and productive communication.

